Vijaynarayan and others vs Kamla devi — 42/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41(1). Disposed: Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed on 21st April 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJBE010016632024
Filing Number
1030/2024
Filing Date
24-09-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijaynarayan and others
Adv. YAGYESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
Kamla devi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 10-04-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vijaynarayan & Others v. Kamla Devi (Civil Appeal 42/2024) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment, holding that the respondent-landlord is entitled to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent, recover arrears of ₹7,740, and receive standard monthly rent of ₹870 plus house tax from March 19, 2003 onward. Key Reasoning: The court found the tenant failed to pay rent from May 1993 onward despite repeated demands, establishing default justifying eviction. The tenant's defense of maintenance cost adjustments lacked documentary evidence, and his defense was properly strike off for non-compliance with interim rent orders, barring him from presenting evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Vijaynarayan & Others v. Kamla Devi (Civil Appeal 42/2024) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment, holding that the respondent-landlord is entitled to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent, recover arrears of ₹7,740, and receive standard monthly rent of ₹870 plus house tax from March 19, 2003 onward. Key Reasoning: The court found the tenant failed to pay rent from May 1993 onward despite repeated demands, establishing default justifying eviction. The tenant's defense of maintenance cost adjustments lacked documentary evidence, and his defense was properly strike off for non-compliance with interim rent orders, barring him from presenting evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts