Vijaynarayan and others vs Kamla devi — 42/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41(1). Disposed: Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed on 21st April 2026.

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJBE010016632024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1030/2024

Filing Date

24-09-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

27-09-2024

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41(1)

Petitioner(s)

Vijaynarayan and others

Adv. YAGYESH KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

Kamla devi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

21-04-2026

Disposed

13-04-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

10-04-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

24-03-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

16-03-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Vijaynarayan & Others v. Kamla Devi (Civil Appeal 42/2024) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment, holding that the respondent-landlord is entitled to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent, recover arrears of ₹7,740, and receive standard monthly rent of ₹870 plus house tax from March 19, 2003 onward. Key Reasoning: The court found the tenant failed to pay rent from May 1993 onward despite repeated demands, establishing default justifying eviction. The tenant's defense of maintenance cost adjustments lacked documentary evidence, and his defense was properly strike off for non-compliance with interim rent orders, barring him from presenting evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vijaynarayan & Others v. Kamla Devi (Civil Appeal 42/2024) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment, holding that the respondent-landlord is entitled to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent, recover arrears of ₹7,740, and receive standard monthly rent of ₹870 plus house tax from March 19, 2003 onward. Key Reasoning: The court found the tenant failed to pay rent from May 1993 onward despite repeated demands, establishing default justifying eviction. The tenant's defense of maintenance cost adjustments lacked documentary evidence, and his defense was properly strike off for non-compliance with interim rent orders, barring him from presenting evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case