state vs Vinod kumar mali — 43/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBE010011142025
Filing Number
414/2025
Filing Date
24-Jun-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
24-Jun-2025
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
4-District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
310
Police Station
Vijaynagar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.state
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinod kumar mali
-
2.Nanu ram mali
-
3.manju mali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar Mali & Others (43/2025) Court: District & Session Judge, Bijaynagar, Rajasthan Judgment Date: April 7, 2026 Key Facts: The complainant reported that his sister Leela (deceased) was allegedly harassed by her husband Vinod Mali and in-laws (Nanuram Mali and Manju Devi) for three years over dowry demands and her inability to conceive. He claimed she was subjected to physical and mental cruelty. On October 2, 2024, Leela was found dead by hanging. The case was filed under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 read with Section 3(5) (dowry death provisions). Court's Findings: The court acquitted all three accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish dowry harassment beyond reasonable doubt. Key reasoning included: - No credible evidence of specific dowry demands with dates or amounts - Medical evidence showed the deceased died from asphyxiation (self-inflicted hanging), not murder - Key witness (deceased's mother) became hostile and contradicted prosecution claims - The marriage was "arte-sarte" (mutual agreement marriage) between two families with minimal guests - No neighbors or community members reported witnessing harassment - Insufficient proximate link between alleged cruelty and death as required by law Decision: The accused were acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar Mali & Others (43/2025) Court: District & Session Judge, Bijaynagar, Rajasthan Judgment Date: April 7, 2026 Key Facts: The complainant reported that his sister Leela (deceased) was allegedly harassed by her husband Vinod Mali and in-laws (Nanuram Mali and Manju Devi) for three years over dowry demands and her inability to conceive. He claimed she was subjected to physical and mental cruelty. On October 2, 2024, Leela was found dead by hanging. The case was filed under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 read with Section 3(5) (dowry death provisions). Court's Findings: The court acquitted all three accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish dowry harassment beyond reasonable doubt. Key reasoning included: - No credible evidence of specific dowry demands with dates or amounts - Medical evidence showed the deceased died from asphyxiation (self-inflicted hanging), not murder - Key witness (deceased's mother) became hostile and contradicted prosecution claims - The marriage was "arte-sarte" (mutual agreement marriage) between two families with minimal guests - No neighbors or community members reported witnessing harassment - Insufficient proximate link between alleged cruelty and death as required by law Decision: The accused were acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts