state vs Vinod kumar mali — 43/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th April 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJBE010011142025

Case disposed

Filing Number

414/2025

Filing Date

24-06-2025

Registration No

43/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

4-District Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

Vijaynagar

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

state

Respondent(s)

Vinod kumar mali

Nanu ram mali

manju mali

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Final arguments

28-03-2026

Final arguments

19-03-2026

Final arguments

16-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar Mali & Others (43/2025) Court: District & Session Judge, Bijaynagar, Rajasthan Judgment Date: April 7, 2026 Key Facts: The complainant reported that his sister Leela (deceased) was allegedly harassed by her husband Vinod Mali and in-laws (Nanuram Mali and Manju Devi) for three years over dowry demands and her inability to conceive. He claimed she was subjected to physical and mental cruelty. On October 2, 2024, Leela was found dead by hanging. The case was filed under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 read with Section 3(5) (dowry death provisions). Court's Findings: The court acquitted all three accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish dowry harassment beyond reasonable doubt. Key reasoning included: - No credible evidence of specific dowry demands with dates or amounts - Medical evidence showed the deceased died from asphyxiation (self-inflicted hanging), not murder - Key witness (deceased's mother) became hostile and contradicted prosecution claims - The marriage was "arte-sarte" (mutual agreement marriage) between two families with minimal guests - No neighbors or community members reported witnessing harassment - Insufficient proximate link between alleged cruelty and death as required by law Decision: The accused were acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar Mali & Others (43/2025) Court: District & Session Judge, Bijaynagar, Rajasthan Judgment Date: April 7, 2026 Key Facts: The complainant reported that his sister Leela (deceased) was allegedly harassed by her husband Vinod Mali and in-laws (Nanuram Mali and Manju Devi) for three years over dowry demands and her inability to conceive. He claimed she was subjected to physical and mental cruelty. On October 2, 2024, Leela was found dead by hanging. The case was filed under IPC Sections 80(2), 85 read with Section 3(5) (dowry death provisions). Court's Findings: The court acquitted all three accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish dowry harassment beyond reasonable doubt. Key reasoning included: - No credible evidence of specific dowry demands with dates or amounts - Medical evidence showed the deceased died from asphyxiation (self-inflicted hanging), not murder - Key witness (deceased's mother) became hostile and contradicted prosecution claims - The marriage was "arte-sarte" (mutual agreement marriage) between two families with minimal guests - No neighbors or community members reported witnessing harassment - Insufficient proximate link between alleged cruelty and death as required by law Decision: The accused were acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case