NAVNEET URF CHOTU vs State — 134/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 01st April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJBE010009062026

Case disposed

Filing Number

446/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

134/2026

Registration Date

14-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

4-District Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

775

Police Station

Beawar City

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

NAVNEET URF CHOTU

Adv. Mahendra singh chouhan

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

27-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

23-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

19-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Order

The District and Sessions Court granted bail to both accused, Rahul Chandriya and Navneet (Chotu), in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 307/34 (attempt to murder) and Arms Act Section 3/25(1)(a). The court found their absences from trial to be justified—one accused surrendered voluntarily upon learning of the proceedings, while the other's absence was due to his wife's medical emergency—and their reasons for non-appearance appeared bonafide. Rahul was released on two sureties of ₹50,000 each with a personal bond of ₹1,00,000, and Navneet on two sureties of ₹35,000 each with a personal bond of ₹70,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Court granted bail to both accused, Rahul Chandriya and Navneet (Chotu), in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 307/34 (attempt to murder) and Arms Act Section 3/25(1)(a). The court found their absences from trial to be justified—one accused surrendered voluntarily upon learning of the proceedings, while the other's absence was due to his wife's medical emergency—and their reasons for non-appearance appeared bonafide. Rahul was released on two sureties of ₹50,000 each with a personal bond of ₹1,00,000, and Navneet on two sureties of ₹35,000 each with a personal bond of ₹70,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case