Khush kumar vs Manju Tekchandani — 54/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39(1)(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 21st April 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBE010008192025
Filing Number
502/2025
Filing Date
06-05-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
4-District Judge
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khush kumar
Adv. DUSHYANT CHOUHAN
Respondent(s)
Manju Tekchandani
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Khush Kumar v. Manju Tekchandani (Case 54/2025) The District and Sessions Court, Byawar, rejected the petitioner's interim injunction plea seeking to restrain property sale and secure succession rights. The 17-year-old petitioner (born from a live-in relationship between deceased Rajesh Kumar Tekchandani and Soni Thakur) claimed heirship rights in ancestral property. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience favored respondents (legally recognized heirs), and irreparable injury cannot be established, given the petitioner must prove paternity and legitimacy status through evidence during full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Khush Kumar v. Manju Tekchandani (Case 54/2025) The District and Sessions Court, Byawar, rejected the petitioner's interim injunction plea seeking to restrain property sale and secure succession rights. The 17-year-old petitioner (born from a live-in relationship between deceased Rajesh Kumar Tekchandani and Soni Thakur) claimed heirship rights in ancestral property. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience favored respondents (legally recognized heirs), and irreparable injury cannot be established, given the petitioner must prove paternity and legitimacy status through evidence during full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts