Khush kumar vs Manju Tekchandani — 54/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39(1)(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJBE010008192025

Filing Number

502/2025

Filing Date

06-May-2025

Registration No

54/2025

Registration Date

06-May-2025

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

4-District Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39(1)(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khush kumar

    Adv. DUSHYANT CHOUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manju Tekchandani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: Khush Kumar v. Manju Tekchandani (Case 54/2025) The District and Sessions Court, Byawar, rejected the petitioner's interim injunction plea seeking to restrain property sale and secure succession rights. The 17-year-old petitioner (born from a live-in relationship between deceased Rajesh Kumar Tekchandani and Soni Thakur) claimed heirship rights in ancestral property. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience favored respondents (legally recognized heirs), and irreparable injury cannot be established, given the petitioner must prove paternity and legitimacy status through evidence during full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 06-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Khush Kumar v. Manju Tekchandani (Case 54/2025) The District and Sessions Court, Byawar, rejected the petitioner's interim injunction plea seeking to restrain property sale and secure succession rights. The 17-year-old petitioner (born from a live-in relationship between deceased Rajesh Kumar Tekchandani and Soni Thakur) claimed heirship rights in ancestral property. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience favored respondents (legally recognized heirs), and irreparable injury cannot be established, given the petitioner must prove paternity and legitimacy status through evidence during full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case