MOHAN LAL vs KAILASH AND OTH.4 Advocate - SHAILENDRA SINGH GANDER — 47728/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 22nd May 2026.
REG. CIVIL SUIT
CNR: RJBE010004402014
Filing Number
5001/2014
Filing Date
19-05-2014
Registration No
47728/2014
Registration Date
19-05-2014
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN LAL
Adv. SOORAJ SINGH CHOUHAN
Respondent(s)
KAILASH AND OTH.4 Advocate - SHAILENDRA SINGH GANDER
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 15-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 14-05-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 09/2025(38/2014), CIS No. 47728/2014 Parties: Mohan Lal (Petitioner) vs. Kailash and Others (Respondents) Court's Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's (Mohan Lal's) suit and dismissed it entirely with costs borne by each party separately. Key Reasoning: The court found that Mohan Lal failed to establish his claim to partition and possession of the disputed property. The evidence revealed that Mohan Lal had no ownership rights over the ancestral property described in the suit—his brother Madangopla and the respondents held actual possession and control. Mohan Lal could not prove ownership through proper documentation or evidence, and the court determined that registered deeds from 1978 and subsequent partition agreements from 1993 and 1999 supported the respondents' claims, not his. The 36-year delay in filing the suit and complete absence of substantiating proof of Mohan Lal's alleged inheritance rights further weakened his position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 09/2025(38/2014), CIS No. 47728/2014 Parties: Mohan Lal (Petitioner) vs. Kailash and Others (Respondents) Court's Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's (Mohan Lal's) suit and dismissed it entirely with costs borne by each party separately. Key Reasoning: The court found that Mohan Lal failed to establish his claim to partition and possession of the disputed property. The evidence revealed that Mohan Lal had no ownership rights over the ancestral property described in the suit—his brother Madangopla and the respondents held actual possession and control. Mohan Lal could not prove ownership through proper documentation or evidence, and the court determined that registered deeds from 1978 and subsequent partition agreements from 1993 and 1999 supported the respondents' claims, not his. The 36-year delay in filing the suit and complete absence of substantiating proof of Mohan Lal's alleged inheritance rights further weakened his position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts