HEMLATA vs CHANDMAL CHOPRA 9 Advocate - N.C.MAEHTA — 39/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
PARTION SUIT / TITLE PARTION SUIT - PARTION SUIT / TITLE PARTION S
CNR: RJBE010004392011
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
Filing Number
1475/2014
Filing Date
17-12-2011
Registration No
39/2014
Registration Date
03-12-2011
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMLATA
Adv. S.K.JAIN
Respondent(s)
CHANDMAL CHOPRA 9 Advocate - N.C.MAEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 20-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 11-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 02-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 39/2014: Hemlata v. Chandmal Chopra Court: District Court, Biyawar (Additional District Judge No. 2) Order Date: 30 July 2025 Outcome: The petitioner Hemlata's application under Section 65-66 of the Indian Evidence Act (read with Section 151 CrPC, dated 03-05-2025) was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for secondary evidence in the form of photocopies of a will dated 26-05-1992 and a certified copy of a sale deed dated 26-11-2011 to be admitted as evidence. The court found that the originals were inaccessible (held by Respondent No. 6) and that the conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act were satisfied, making secondary evidence admissible to establish the existence, condition, and contents of these crucial documents in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 39/2014: Hemlata v. Chandmal Chopra Court: District Court, Biyawar (Additional District Judge No. 2) Order Date: 30 July 2025 Outcome: The petitioner Hemlata's application under Section 65-66 of the Indian Evidence Act (read with Section 151 CrPC, dated 03-05-2025) was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for secondary evidence in the form of photocopies of a will dated 26-05-1992 and a certified copy of a sale deed dated 26-11-2011 to be admitted as evidence. The court found that the originals were inaccessible (held by Respondent No. 6) and that the conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act were satisfied, making secondary evidence admissible to establish the existence, condition, and contents of these crucial documents in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts