HEMLATA vs CHANDMAL CHOPRA 9 Advocate - N.C.MAEHTA — 39/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

PARTION SUIT / TITLE PARTION SUIT - PARTION SUIT / TITLE PARTION S

CNR: RJBE010004392011

Plaintiff Evidence

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

Filing Number

1475/2014

Filing Date

17-12-2011

Registration No

39/2014

Registration Date

03-12-2011

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

HEMLATA

Adv. S.K.JAIN

Respondent(s)

CHANDMAL CHOPRA 9 Advocate - N.C.MAEHTA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

26-05-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

20-05-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

11-05-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

04-05-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

02-05-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Interim Orders

23-07-2024
30-07-2025

Summary of Case 39/2014: Hemlata v. Chandmal Chopra Court: District Court, Biyawar (Additional District Judge No. 2) Order Date: 30 July 2025 Outcome: The petitioner Hemlata's application under Section 65-66 of the Indian Evidence Act (read with Section 151 CrPC, dated 03-05-2025) was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for secondary evidence in the form of photocopies of a will dated 26-05-1992 and a certified copy of a sale deed dated 26-11-2011 to be admitted as evidence. The court found that the originals were inaccessible (held by Respondent No. 6) and that the conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act were satisfied, making secondary evidence admissible to establish the existence, condition, and contents of these crucial documents in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 39/2014: Hemlata v. Chandmal Chopra Court: District Court, Biyawar (Additional District Judge No. 2) Order Date: 30 July 2025 Outcome: The petitioner Hemlata's application under Section 65-66 of the Indian Evidence Act (read with Section 151 CrPC, dated 03-05-2025) was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for secondary evidence in the form of photocopies of a will dated 26-05-1992 and a certified copy of a sale deed dated 26-11-2011 to be admitted as evidence. The court found that the originals were inaccessible (held by Respondent No. 6) and that the conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act were satisfied, making secondary evidence admissible to establish the existence, condition, and contents of these crucial documents in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case