Sunil Chouhan vs Anil Kothari etc — 4/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 16th March 2026.

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJBE010000972026

Case disposed

Filing Number

43/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Chouhan

Adv. Mahendra singh chouhan

Respondent(s)

Anil Kothari etc

State

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

16-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

02-02-2026

Compliance

19-01-2026

Compliance

14-01-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Sunil Chouhan v. Anil Kothari (4/2026) The court accepted Sunil Chouhan's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's order dated 29.11.2025, which had terminated the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the lower court erred in denying the accused's fundamental right to examine witnesses without proper justification, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and granted the accused one final opportunity to cross-examine with ₹10,000 cost, emphasizing that the right to cross-examination is essential for fair trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sunil Chouhan v. Anil Kothari (4/2026) The court accepted Sunil Chouhan's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's order dated 29.11.2025, which had terminated the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the lower court erred in denying the accused's fundamental right to examine witnesses without proper justification, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and granted the accused one final opportunity to cross-examine with ₹10,000 cost, emphasizing that the right to cross-examination is essential for fair trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case