Sunil Chouhan vs Anil Kothari etc — 4/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 16th March 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJBE010000972026
Filing Number
43/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
DJ ADJ-BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Chouhan
Adv. Mahendra singh chouhan
Respondent(s)
Anil Kothari etc
State
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 19-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 14-01-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sunil Chouhan v. Anil Kothari (4/2026) The court accepted Sunil Chouhan's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's order dated 29.11.2025, which had terminated the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the lower court erred in denying the accused's fundamental right to examine witnesses without proper justification, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and granted the accused one final opportunity to cross-examine with ₹10,000 cost, emphasizing that the right to cross-examination is essential for fair trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sunil Chouhan v. Anil Kothari (4/2026) The court accepted Sunil Chouhan's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's order dated 29.11.2025, which had terminated the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the lower court erred in denying the accused's fundamental right to examine witnesses without proper justification, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and granted the accused one final opportunity to cross-examine with ₹10,000 cost, emphasizing that the right to cross-examination is essential for fair trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts