MAHENDER SINGH vs SITARAM ETC. — 13/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O,R,7. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBD150000282018
Filing Number
28/2018
Filing Date
30-Jun-2018
Registration No
13/2018
Registration Date
17-Mar-2025
Court
CJ JD Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHENDER SINGH
Adv. HEMANT YOGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SITARAM ETC.
-
2.SMT.SIMABAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
08-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
01-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
10-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
27-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
15-Jan-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
09-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
05-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
21-Nov-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
14-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
30-Oct-2025
Compliance
Jm
-
09-Oct-2025
Compliance
Jm
-
18-Sep-2025
Compliance
Jm
-
28-Aug-2025
Compliance
Jm
-
11-Aug-2025
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
04-Jul-2025
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
23-May-2025
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
08-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
25-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
03-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
17-Mar-2025
Restored
Jm
-
17-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
17-Aug-2024
Plaint/Petition/AppealmemoView PDF
Case Summary: Civil Case 13/2018 Mahender Singh v. Sitaram & Smt. Simabai The court granted petitioner Mahender Singh's application for permanent injunction against respondents Sitaram and Smt. Simabai. Singh had purchased a land plot in village Babayi, Indragarh (totaling 12,189 sq. yards with structures) from Vaidh Gautam Ram in 1998 and maintained continuous possession. The respondents forcibly encroached upon the corner of the plot on June 22, 2018, and threatened unauthorized construction. The court found Singh's ownership and possession established through documentary evidence and witness testimony, and restrained respondents from trespassing, constructing, or otherwise interfering with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Aug-2024
Disposed
Jm
-
08-Aug-2024
Issues
Jm
-
02-Aug-2024
Issues
Jm
-
01-Aug-2024
Issues
Jm
-
26-Jul-2024
Issues
Jm
-
05-Jul-2024
Issues
Jm
-
16-May-2024
Issues
Jm
-
19-Apr-2024
Issues
Jm
-
01-Mar-2024
Issues
Acjm
-
15-Feb-2024
Issues
Acjm
-
18-Jan-2024
Issues
Acjm
-
14-Dec-2023
Issues
Acjm
-
02-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
25-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Apr-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
-
09-Feb-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
22-Dec-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
20-Oct-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
26-Aug-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
08-Jul-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
27-Apr-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
11-Mar-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
21-Jan-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
12-Nov-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Jm
-
24-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Jm
-
10-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Jm
-
27-Aug-2021
Written Statement
Jm
-
23-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Jm
-
28-May-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
16-Apr-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
05-Mar-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
29-Jan-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
18-Dec-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
09-Nov-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
13-Oct-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
25-Aug-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
09-Jul-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
07-May-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
03-Apr-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
06-Mar-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
24-Jan-2020
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
20-Dec-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
15-Nov-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
04-Oct-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
30-Aug-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
19-Jul-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
17-May-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
05-Apr-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
01-Mar-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
18-Jan-2019
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
21-Dec-2018
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
02-Nov-2018
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
05-Oct-2018
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
23-Aug-2018
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
09-Aug-2018
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
02-Aug-2018
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm
-
18-Jul-2018
Appearance of parties/ advocates
Jm
-
05-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2018
Case Summary: Civil Case 13/2018 Mahender Singh v. Sitaram & Smt. Simabai The court granted petitioner Mahender Singh's application for permanent injunction against respondents Sitaram and Smt. Simabai. Singh had purchased a land plot in village Babayi, Indragarh (totaling 12,189 sq. yards with structures) from Vaidh Gautam Ram in 1998 and maintained continuous possession. The respondents forcibly encroached upon the corner of the plot on June 22, 2018, and threatened unauthorized construction. The court found Singh's ownership and possession established through documentary evidence and witness testimony, and restrained respondents from trespassing, constructing, or otherwise interfering with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts