MAHENDER SINGH vs SITARAM ETC. — 13/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O,R,7. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBD150000282018
Filing Number
28/2018
Filing Date
30-06-2018
Registration No
13/2018
Registration Date
17-03-2025
Court
CJ JD Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHENDER SINGH
Adv. HEMANT YOGI
Respondent(s)
SITARAM ETC.
SMT.SIMABAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 01-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Case 13/2018 Mahender Singh v. Sitaram & Smt. Simabai The court granted petitioner Mahender Singh's application for permanent injunction against respondents Sitaram and Smt. Simabai. Singh had purchased a land plot in village Babayi, Indragarh (totaling 12,189 sq. yards with structures) from Vaidh Gautam Ram in 1998 and maintained continuous possession. The respondents forcibly encroached upon the corner of the plot on June 22, 2018, and threatened unauthorized construction. The court found Singh's ownership and possession established through documentary evidence and witness testimony, and restrained respondents from trespassing, constructing, or otherwise interfering with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Case 13/2018 Mahender Singh v. Sitaram & Smt. Simabai The court granted petitioner Mahender Singh's application for permanent injunction against respondents Sitaram and Smt. Simabai. Singh had purchased a land plot in village Babayi, Indragarh (totaling 12,189 sq. yards with structures) from Vaidh Gautam Ram in 1998 and maintained continuous possession. The respondents forcibly encroached upon the corner of the plot on June 22, 2018, and threatened unauthorized construction. The court found Singh's ownership and possession established through documentary evidence and witness testimony, and restrained respondents from trespassing, constructing, or otherwise interfering with the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts