State vs Balram Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI — 214/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD140004282022
Filing Number
428/2022
Filing Date
02-Aug-2022
Registration No
214/2022
Registration Date
02-Aug-2022
Court
JM Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
Indergarh
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balram Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 214/2022) Court: Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh, Buandi District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 01.05.2026 Charges: IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) Outcome: Accused Balram acquitted of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused restrained and assaulted the complainant on 05.06.2022. While the complainant testified about an incident involving a motorcycle collision, the prosecution's eyewitnesses provided inconsistent accounts—some contradicting the alleged assault, with witness statements indicating they did not actually observe any fight or beating. The court noted critical gaps: the police did not create a scene map, and multiple witnesses testified they saw no violence. Given these contradictions and lack of corroborating evidence, the court held the charge unproven and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
10-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
02-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
27-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
27-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
10-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
02-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
24-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
04-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
27-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
12-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
27-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 214/2022
Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 214/2022) Court: Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh, Buandi District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 01.05.2026 Charges: IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) Outcome: Accused Balram acquitted of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused restrained and assaulted the complainant on 05.06.2022. While the complainant testified about an incident involving a motorcycle collision, the prosecution's eyewitnesses provided inconsistent accounts—some contradicting the alleged assault, with witness statements indicating they did not actually observe any fight or beating. The court noted critical gaps: the police did not create a scene map, and multiple witnesses testified they saw no violence. Given these contradictions and lack of corroborating evidence, the court held the charge unproven and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts