State vs Balram Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI — 214/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140004282022

Case disposed

Filing Number

428/2022

Filing Date

02-08-2022

Registration No

214/2022

Registration Date

02-08-2022

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

01st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

Balram Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

01-05-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

02-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

23-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

01-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 214/2022) Court: Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh, Buandi District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 01.05.2026 Charges: IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) Outcome: Accused Balram acquitted of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused restrained and assaulted the complainant on 05.06.2022. While the complainant testified about an incident involving a motorcycle collision, the prosecution's eyewitnesses provided inconsistent accounts—some contradicting the alleged assault, with witness statements indicating they did not actually observe any fight or beating. The court noted critical gaps: the police did not create a scene map, and multiple witnesses testified they saw no violence. Given these contradictions and lack of corroborating evidence, the court held the charge unproven and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 214/2022) Court: Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh, Buandi District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 01.05.2026 Charges: IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) Outcome: Accused Balram acquitted of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused restrained and assaulted the complainant on 05.06.2022. While the complainant testified about an incident involving a motorcycle collision, the prosecution's eyewitnesses provided inconsistent accounts—some contradicting the alleged assault, with witness statements indicating they did not actually observe any fight or beating. The court noted critical gaps: the police did not create a scene map, and multiple witnesses testified they saw no violence. Given these contradictions and lack of corroborating evidence, the court held the charge unproven and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM Indergarh Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case