STATE vs HEMRAJ ETC. Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF — 172/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,448,427. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140003932021

Filing Number

393/2021

Filing Date

20-Oct-2021

Registration No

172/2021

Registration Date

20-Oct-2021

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,448,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMRAJ ETC. Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF

  2. 2.MEGHRAJ

  3. 3.LAKSHMAN

  4. 4.BHARATLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Indragarh, Bundi district acquitted all four accused (Hemraj, Meghraj, Bhartlal, and Lakshman) on March 10, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 448 (criminal trespass), and 427 (mischief causing damage) beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly noting that the key eyewitness (Asif) claimed no knowledge of the incident despite being present at the property, while other prosecution witnesses provided contradictory accounts about who witnessed the alleged property damage on February 29, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 02-May-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  17. 18-Mar-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  19. 02-Jan-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  20. 07-Dec-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  21. 02-Dec-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  22. 11-Nov-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  23. 10-Oct-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  24. 19-Sep-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  26. 04-Jul-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  28. 07-May-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  29. 16-Mar-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  30. 05-Jan-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  31. 03-Nov-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  32. 08-Sep-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  33. 07-Jul-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  34. 01-Apr-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

  35. 25-Jan-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  36. 28-Oct-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  37. 06-Aug-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  38. 15-Jun-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  39. 12-May-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  40. 04-Apr-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  41. 21-Dec-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  42. 29-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 20-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Indragarh, Bundi district acquitted all four accused (Hemraj, Meghraj, Bhartlal, and Lakshman) on March 10, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 448 (criminal trespass), and 427 (mischief causing damage) beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly noting that the key eyewitness (Asif) claimed no knowledge of the incident despite being present at the property, while other prosecution witnesses provided contradictory accounts about who witnessed the alleged property damage on February 29, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case