State vs Ramcharan Advocate - RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN — 181/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD140003342023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
333/2023
Filing Date
07-10-2023
Registration No
181/2023
Registration Date
07-10-2023
Court
JM Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Indergarh
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Ramcharan Advocate - RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted the accused Ramcharan (age 31) of charges under Section 354 IPC (outraging modesty of a woman) on March 27, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimonies were contradictory and all witnesses were related to the complainant, making them biased. The evidence presented did not conclusively establish that the accused used criminal force with intent to outrage the complainant's modesty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted the accused Ramcharan (age 31) of charges under Section 354 IPC (outraging modesty of a woman) on March 27, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimonies were contradictory and all witnesses were related to the complainant, making them biased. The evidence presented did not conclusively establish that the accused used criminal force with intent to outrage the complainant's modesty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts