State vs Kana urf Kanheya Lal Advocate - Aarif Ali — 172/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 323, 452, 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD140003222023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
321/2023
Filing Date
22-09-2023
Registration No
172/2023
Registration Date
22-09-2023
Court
JM Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
Indergarh
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Kana urf Kanheya Lal Advocate - Aarif Ali
Rakesh
Rampal
Seema
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted all four accused persons—Kanha Urf Kunhaiyalal, Rakesh, Rampal, and Seema—of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 452, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant (Chotulal) and his wife (Dholabai) on June 9, 2023, as the evidence presented, primarily from family members, appeared biased and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. The court noted inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding injuries and circumstances, observing that the complainant had filed a counter-case against the accused's son, suggesting a family dispute rather than substantiated criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted all four accused persons—Kanha Urf Kunhaiyalal, Rakesh, Rampal, and Seema—of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 452, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant (Chotulal) and his wife (Dholabai) on June 9, 2023, as the evidence presented, primarily from family members, appeared biased and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. The court noted inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding injuries and circumstances, observing that the complainant had filed a counter-case against the accused's son, suggesting a family dispute rather than substantiated criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts