State vs Kana urf Kanheya Lal Advocate - Aarif Ali — 172/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 323, 452, 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140003222023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

321/2023

Filing Date

22-09-2023

Registration No

172/2023

Registration Date

22-09-2023

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341, 323, 452, 34

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Kana urf Kanheya Lal Advocate - Aarif Ali

Rakesh

Rampal

Seema

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

27-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Final arguments

10-03-2026

Final arguments

27-02-2026

Final arguments

25-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted all four accused persons—Kanha Urf Kunhaiyalal, Rakesh, Rampal, and Seema—of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 452, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant (Chotulal) and his wife (Dholabai) on June 9, 2023, as the evidence presented, primarily from family members, appeared biased and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. The court noted inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding injuries and circumstances, observing that the complainant had filed a counter-case against the accused's son, suggesting a family dispute rather than substantiated criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted all four accused persons—Kanha Urf Kunhaiyalal, Rakesh, Rampal, and Seema—of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 452, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant (Chotulal) and his wife (Dholabai) on June 9, 2023, as the evidence presented, primarily from family members, appeared biased and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. The court noted inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding injuries and circumstances, observing that the complainant had filed a counter-case against the accused's son, suggesting a family dispute rather than substantiated criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM Indergarh Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case