State vs Shaktiman Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF — 159/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354 354B,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140002972023

Case disposed

Filing Number

296/2023

Filing Date

05-09-2023

Registration No

159/2023

Registration Date

05-09-2023

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354 354B,457

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Shaktiman Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

26-05-2026

Disposed

22-05-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

02-05-2026

Prosecution Evidence

16-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

10-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

26-05-2026
Judgement

Case 159/2023 Summary State v. Shaktiman Advocate (Mohd. Shareef) - Acquittal The Indragarh Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Shaktiman on charges under IPC Sections 323 (voluntary hurt), 354 (outraging modesty), 354(b) (disrobing), and 457 (house trespass) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of molestation occurring on April 30, 2023, as the victim's written statement was absent and witness testimonies contained material contradictions regarding the date, time, and specifics of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 159/2023 Summary State v. Shaktiman Advocate (Mohd. Shareef) - Acquittal The Indragarh Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Shaktiman on charges under IPC Sections 323 (voluntary hurt), 354 (outraging modesty), 354(b) (disrobing), and 457 (house trespass) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of molestation occurring on April 30, 2023, as the victim's written statement was absent and witness testimonies contained material contradictions regarding the date, time, and specifics of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM Indergarh Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case