STATE vs AMIN MOHAMMAD ETC. Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF — 111/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 547,380,414,411. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140002162022

Filing Number

216/2022

Filing Date

05-Apr-2022

Registration No

111/2022

Registration Date

05-Apr-2022

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 547,380,414,411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIN MOHAMMAD ETC. Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF

  2. 2.DEVRAJ

    Adv. MOHD. SHAREEF

  3. 3.SHAHRUKH KHAN

    Adv. MOHD. SHAREEF

  4. 4.DEEPAK

    Adv. R V SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Indragarh acquitted all four accused persons (Amin Mohammad, Devraj, Shahrukh Khan, and Deepak Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 414, and 411, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient independent witness corroboration and evidentiary gaps regarding the seized property's ownership connection to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 02-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 06-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 02-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 18-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 31-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 03-Oct-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  26. 19-Sep-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  27. 06-Sep-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  28. 11-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 04-Jul-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  30. 31-May-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  31. 15-Apr-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  32. 11-Mar-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  33. 04-Feb-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  34. 17-Dec-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  35. 13-Nov-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  36. 09-Oct-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  37. 10-Sep-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  38. 14-Aug-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  39. 23-Jul-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  40. 24-Jun-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  41. 22-May-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  42. 16-May-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  43. 18-Apr-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  44. 14-Mar-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  45. 03-Feb-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  46. 04-Jan-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  47. 02-Dec-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  48. 02-Nov-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  49. 08-Sep-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  50. 19-Jul-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  51. 11-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 21-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  53. 17-Feb-2023

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  54. 04-Jan-2023

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  55. 12-Dec-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  56. 28-Sep-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  57. 06-Sep-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  58. 28-Jun-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  59. 05-May-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  60. 22-Apr-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  61. 11-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 05-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Indragarh acquitted all four accused persons (Amin Mohammad, Devraj, Shahrukh Khan, and Deepak Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 414, and 411, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient independent witness corroboration and evidentiary gaps regarding the seized property's ownership connection to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case