STATE vs NIRMAL KUMAR Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI — 75/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140001262021

Case disposed

Filing Number

126/2021

Filing Date

01-04-2021

Registration No

75/2021

Registration Date

01-04-2021

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

NIRMAL KUMAR Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

02-05-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Final arguments

08-04-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

06-04-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

01-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Nirmal Kumar (Case 75/2021) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Nirmal Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle involved in the accident on 29.03.2020 near Balaji Mode, Indragarh, which resulted in injuries to two persons and death of one (Medharam). While multiple forest department employees testified that two injured persons arrived at the hospital after being hit by a vehicle, no witness directly established that the accused—operating a forest department vehicle registration RJ25GA1151—caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Nirmal Kumar (Case 75/2021) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Nirmal Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle involved in the accident on 29.03.2020 near Balaji Mode, Indragarh, which resulted in injuries to two persons and death of one (Medharam). While multiple forest department employees testified that two injured persons arrived at the hospital after being hit by a vehicle, no witness directly established that the accused—operating a forest department vehicle registration RJ25GA1151—caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM Indergarh Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case