STATE vs NIRMAL KUMAR Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI — 75/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD140001262021

Filing Number

126/2021

Filing Date

01-Apr-2021

Registration No

75/2021

Registration Date

01-Apr-2021

Court

JM Indergarh Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIRMAL KUMAR Advocate - TRILOKNATH YOGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Nirmal Kumar (Case 75/2021) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Nirmal Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle involved in the accident on 29.03.2020 near Balaji Mode, Indragarh, which resulted in injuries to two persons and death of one (Medharam). While multiple forest department employees testified that two injured persons arrived at the hospital after being hit by a vehicle, no witness directly established that the accused—operating a forest department vehicle registration RJ25GA1151—caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 22-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 17-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 17-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 05-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 24-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 06-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 08-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 25-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 27-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 09-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 28-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 23-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 23-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 10-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 14-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 09-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 22-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 21-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 31-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 03-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 04-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 01-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  42. 04-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 03-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 07-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 23-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 16-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 29-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 04-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 06-Oct-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  50. 06-Sep-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  51. 28-Jul-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  52. 17-Jun-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  53. 06-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 01-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Nirmal Kumar (Case 75/2021) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Nirmal Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle involved in the accident on 29.03.2020 near Balaji Mode, Indragarh, which resulted in injuries to two persons and death of one (Medharam). While multiple forest department employees testified that two injured persons arrived at the hospital after being hit by a vehicle, no witness directly established that the accused—operating a forest department vehicle registration RJ25GA1151—caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case