Mainka kumari vs Kalu lal — 281/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled outside the Court on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBD120011512021

Filing Number

1150/2021

Filing Date

23-Sep-2021

Registration No

281/2021

Registration Date

23-Sep-2021

Court

ACJM JM Hindoli Taluka Criminal Cases

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled outside the Court

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mainka kumari

    Adv. Shambhu Dayal Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalu lal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  6. 06-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  8. 07-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  10. 05-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  11. 02-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  12. 19-May-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  13. 06-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  14. 06-Feb-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  15. 28-Nov-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  16. 26-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  17. 09-Jul-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  18. 20-May-2024

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: Meinka Kumari v. Kalu Lal (281/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hindoli, Bundi (Rajasthan) partially allowed Meinka Kumari's petition dated 02.08.2023 seeking to produce government documents as evidence. The court admitted certified copies of the respondent Kalu Lal's appointment order and pay slip into the record, finding them relevant and admissible as they were obtained under the Right to Information Act regarding the respondent's income. Key Reasoning: The court held that while the petitioner's testimony had been recorded, she retained the right to produce these documents during her evidence through a formal application. The documents were deemed relevant to establish the respondent's financial status and were properly obtained through official channels by the livestock department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 20-May-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  20. 06-May-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  21. 19-Apr-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  22. 22-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  23. 28-Feb-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  24. 15-Feb-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  25. 15-Jan-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  26. 24-Nov-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  27. 19-Sep-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  28. 02-Aug-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  29. 03-Jul-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  30. 29-May-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  31. 29-Apr-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  32. 27-Mar-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  33. 15-Oct-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  34. 28-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  35. 12-Jul-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  36. 28-May-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  37. 18-Apr-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  38. 31-Mar-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  39. 11-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 23-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Meinka Kumari v. Kalu Lal (281/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hindoli, Bundi (Rajasthan) partially allowed Meinka Kumari's petition dated 02.08.2023 seeking to produce government documents as evidence. The court admitted certified copies of the respondent Kalu Lal's appointment order and pay slip into the record, finding them relevant and admissible as they were obtained under the Right to Information Act regarding the respondent's income. Key Reasoning: The court held that while the petitioner's testimony had been recorded, she retained the right to produce these documents during her evidence through a formal application. The documents were deemed relevant to establish the respondent's financial status and were properly obtained through official channels by the livestock department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case