VIMLESH vs UNKNOWN — 1/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD120000812025

Filing Number

81/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

10-Jan-2025

Court

ACJM JM Hindoli Taluka Criminal Cases

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

99

Police Station

Excise Thana Nainwan

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIMLESH

    Adv. Jagdish Prasad Gurjar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNKNOWN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Summary The court rejected the complainant's protest petition against an FIR for rash and negligent driving causing injuries (IPC Sections 279, 337, 338). While evidence established that the complainant and her family suffered injuries in a motorcycle accident, the court found insufficient direct evidence identifying the hit-and-run vehicle or its driver, as the complainant could only provide the motorcycle number 8-10 days after the incident without corroborating witness testimony. Additionally, the court dismissed several procedural applications filed by both parties regarding improper document filing and non-appearance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Acjm

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Acjm

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Acjm

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 09-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The court rejected the complainant's protest petition against an FIR for rash and negligent driving causing injuries (IPC Sections 279, 337, 338). While evidence established that the complainant and her family suffered injuries in a motorcycle accident, the court found insufficient direct evidence identifying the hit-and-run vehicle or its driver, as the complainant could only provide the motorcycle number 8-10 days after the incident without corroborating witness testimony. Additionally, the court dismissed several procedural applications filed by both parties regarding improper document filing and non-appearance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case