DEEMALA vs UMASHANKAR — 544/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(A). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 18th April 2026.

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBD080014782024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1476/2024

Filing Date

11-12-2024

Registration No

544/2024

Registration Date

11-12-2024

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(A)

Petitioner(s)

DEEMALA

Adv. Manish Kumar Agrawal

Respondent(s)

UMASHANKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

18-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

13-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

05-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

20-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Deemala v. Umashankar (544/2024) The court ordered the husband (respondent Umashankar) to pay interim maintenance of ₹3,000 per month to his wife (petitioner Deemala) for her sustenance, effective from September 24, 2024, deposited into her bank account. The court recognized the valid marriage between the parties (solemnized May 7, 2021) and found the husband's financial capacity to support maintenance, rejecting his claims that he lacked stable income while noting his agricultural land, machinery, and regular earnings of approximately ₹5,70,000 annually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Deemala v. Umashankar (544/2024) The court ordered the husband (respondent Umashankar) to pay interim maintenance of ₹3,000 per month to his wife (petitioner Deemala) for her sustenance, effective from September 24, 2024, deposited into her bank account. The court recognized the valid marriage between the parties (solemnized May 7, 2021) and found the husband's financial capacity to support maintenance, rejecting his claims that he lacked stable income while noting his agricultural land, machinery, and regular earnings of approximately ₹5,70,000 annually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case