State vs DEEPAK Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati — 635/2021

Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080012942021

Filing Number

1287/2021

Filing Date

24-Nov-2021

Registration No

635/2021

Registration Date

24-Nov-2021

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota convicted the accused, Deepak (age 21), under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, for illegally possessing a 30 cm long iron dagger/knife with a 15 cm blade without proper authorization on March 20, 2021. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹10,000 and supervised release on probation, finding the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies and documentary evidence sufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 18-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 16-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 09-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 10-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 25-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 21-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 27-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 23-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 03-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 12-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 06-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 10-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 10-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 19-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 18-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 17-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 26-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 21-Jul-2022

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  39. 25-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 24-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 635/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota convicted the accused, Deepak (age 21), under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, for illegally possessing a 30 cm long iron dagger/knife with a 15 cm blade without proper authorization on March 20, 2021. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹10,000 and supervised release on probation, finding the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies and documentary evidence sufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case