State vs JUNAID URF SAIED KHAN — 453/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,452,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD080011792024
Filing Number
1178/2024
Filing Date
27-Sep-2024
Registration No
453/2024
Registration Date
27-Sep-2024
Court
ACJM JM K Patan Taluka
Judge
2-Acjm
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER
Respondent(s)
-
1.JUNAID URF SAIED KHAN
-
2.AAFTAF
-
3.AASHIQ MOHAMMAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota, Rajasthan acquitted three accused (Aftab, Junaid Urfz Sahid, and Ashik) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 452 (read with Section 34) on March 10, 2026. The court found that prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forcibly entered the complainant's home and committed assault, citing significant contradictions and inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly regarding the date, time, and location of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
09-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
26-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
03-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
22-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 453/2024
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota, Rajasthan acquitted three accused (Aftab, Junaid Urfz Sahid, and Ashik) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 452 (read with Section 34) on March 10, 2026. The court found that prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forcibly entered the complainant's home and committed assault, citing significant contradictions and inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly regarding the date, time, and location of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts