State vs AAKASH ETC Advocate - Nilesh Samriya — 373/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD080009712023
Filing Number
970/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
373/2023
Registration Date
21-08-2023
Court
ACJM JM K Patan Taluka
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
K.Patan
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER
Respondent(s)
AAKASH ETC Advocate - Nilesh Samriya
SHIVA
Adv. Mahendra Singh Gaur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Aakash & Shiva (Case 373/2023) The court acquitted both accused, Aakash and Shiva, of theft charges under IPC Section 379. Although the prosecution presented ten witnesses and circumstantial evidence including FIR reports, site plans, and seizure documents, the court found the case riddled with reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that no independent eyewitness directly observed the accused stealing government property (iron railings) from a municipal building on May 1, 2023, and critical evidence—including alleged video footage of the theft—was never produced before the court despite being referenced in the prosecution narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Aakash & Shiva (Case 373/2023) The court acquitted both accused, Aakash and Shiva, of theft charges under IPC Section 379. Although the prosecution presented ten witnesses and circumstantial evidence including FIR reports, site plans, and seizure documents, the court found the case riddled with reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that no independent eyewitness directly observed the accused stealing government property (iron railings) from a municipal building on May 1, 2023, and critical evidence—including alleged video footage of the theft—was never produced before the court despite being referenced in the prosecution narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts