State vs AAKASH ETC Advocate - Nilesh Samriya — 373/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080009712023

Filing Number

970/2023

Filing Date

21-Aug-2023

Registration No

373/2023

Registration Date

21-Aug-2023

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AAKASH ETC Advocate - Nilesh Samriya

  2. 2.SHIVA

    Adv. Mahendra Singh Gaur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Aakash & Shiva (Case 373/2023) The court acquitted both accused, Aakash and Shiva, of theft charges under IPC Section 379. Although the prosecution presented ten witnesses and circumstantial evidence including FIR reports, site plans, and seizure documents, the court found the case riddled with reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that no independent eyewitness directly observed the accused stealing government property (iron railings) from a municipal building on May 1, 2023, and critical evidence—including alleged video footage of the theft—was never produced before the court despite being referenced in the prosecution narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 09-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 23-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 23-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 19-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 18-Nov-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  20. 10-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  21. 09-Sep-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  22. 08-Aug-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  23. 15-Jul-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  24. 13-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 13-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 21-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 24-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 19-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 21-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 373/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Aakash & Shiva (Case 373/2023) The court acquitted both accused, Aakash and Shiva, of theft charges under IPC Section 379. Although the prosecution presented ten witnesses and circumstantial evidence including FIR reports, site plans, and seizure documents, the court found the case riddled with reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that no independent eyewitness directly observed the accused stealing government property (iron railings) from a municipal building on May 1, 2023, and critical evidence—including alleged video footage of the theft—was never produced before the court despite being referenced in the prosecution narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case