State vs BANTI — 382/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 16th April 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080009392022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

938/2022

Filing Date

06-07-2022

Registration No

382/2022

Registration Date

06-07-2022

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

FIR Details

FIR Number

137

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,
Motor Vehicles Act Section 3,181,

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

BANTI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

16-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Final arguments

10-03-2026

Final arguments

26-02-2026

Final arguments

12-02-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of K. Patan convicted the accused (Banti) under IPC Sections 279, 337 (rash/negligent driving causing injuries) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 3/181 (driving without valid license). The court found the accused deliberately rammed his jeep into the complainant's car on 22.02.2022, causing injuries to the complainant's family members. However, the court granted the accused probation under the Probation Act instead of imprisonment, given his lack of prior criminal record and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of K. Patan convicted the accused (Banti) under IPC Sections 279, 337 (rash/negligent driving causing injuries) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 3/181 (driving without valid license). The court found the accused deliberately rammed his jeep into the complainant's car on 22.02.2022, causing injuries to the complainant's family members. However, the court granted the accused probation under the Probation Act instead of imprisonment, given his lack of prior criminal record and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case