State vs RAMKUNWAR @ RAMKUMAR Advocate - Jagdish Dadhich — 221/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,447. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080005512018

Filing Number

551/2018

Filing Date

06-Apr-2018

Registration No

221/2018

Registration Date

06-Apr-2018

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

459

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,447

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMKUNWAR @ RAMKUMAR Advocate - Jagdish Dadhich

  2. 2.RAMPAL

    Adv. J.D.

  3. 3.KISHANLAL

    Adv. J.D.

  4. 4.KALAWATI BAI

    Adv. J.D.

  5. 5.KANTIBAI @ KANHI

    Adv. J.D.

  6. 6.RAMGHANI

    Adv. J.D.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary Case 221/2018 - State vs. Ramkunwar & Others The court convicted six accused individuals under IPC Sections 323, 341, 147, and 149 for an assault on November 14, 2017, where they attacked a farmer and his family with weapons, causing injuries. However, the accused were acquitted under Section 447 (criminal trespass) as the prosecution failed to establish unauthorized entry with sufficient evidence. The court sentenced each convict to rigorous imprisonment with fines under the Probation of Offenders Act, while allowing probation benefits given their rural background and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 18-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 26-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 17-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 05-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 19-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 30-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 25-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 07-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 02-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 04-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 01-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 05-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 17-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 18-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 25-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 04-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 10-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 04-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 03-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 08-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 31-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 22-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 19-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 05-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 04-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 23-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 22-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 28-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 20-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 20-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 15-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 15-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 17-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 25-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 12-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 25-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 06-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 221/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case 221/2018 - State vs. Ramkunwar & Others The court convicted six accused individuals under IPC Sections 323, 341, 147, and 149 for an assault on November 14, 2017, where they attacked a farmer and his family with weapons, causing injuries. However, the accused were acquitted under Section 447 (criminal trespass) as the prosecution failed to establish unauthorized entry with sufficient evidence. The court sentenced each convict to rigorous imprisonment with fines under the Probation of Offenders Act, while allowing probation benefits given their rural background and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case