State vs RAVI KUMAR Advocate - Abdul Ajeez — 182/2018

Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080004552018

Filing Number

455/2018

Filing Date

21-Mar-2018

Registration No

182/2018

Registration Date

21-Mar-2018

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR Advocate - Abdul Ajeez

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Reg.Cri.Case/182/2018 The court convicted Ravi Kumar under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 for illegally possessing a licensed dagger (churra). On 21.02.2018, police apprehended the accused carrying a 45 cm dagger without a valid license in a public area (Kota Road, K-Patan). Based on four prosecution witnesses' consistent testimony corroborating the seizure and the court's acceptance of the physical evidence, the accused was found guilty as charged. The court sentenced the accused to probation under the Probation Act, 1958, imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000 with one year rigorous imprisonment in default, while permitting release on a personal bond and surety bond pending appeal to the higher court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  8. 07-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  9. 30-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 27-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 07-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 21-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 15-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  15. 28-Aug-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  16. 30-Jul-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  17. 23-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 16-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 27-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 14-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 24-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 17-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 23-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 02-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  25. 19-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 14-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 18-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 20-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 27-Sep-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  30. 04-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  31. 17-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 25-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 02-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 30-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 20-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 09-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 15-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 07-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 08-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 10-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 17-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 15-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 12-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 07-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 30-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 31-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 28-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 29-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 27-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 17-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 04-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 21-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Reg.Cri.Case/182/2018 The court convicted Ravi Kumar under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 for illegally possessing a licensed dagger (churra). On 21.02.2018, police apprehended the accused carrying a 45 cm dagger without a valid license in a public area (Kota Road, K-Patan). Based on four prosecution witnesses' consistent testimony corroborating the seizure and the court's acceptance of the physical evidence, the accused was found guilty as charged. The court sentenced the accused to probation under the Probation Act, 1958, imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000 with one year rigorous imprisonment in default, while permitting release on a personal bond and surety bond pending appeal to the higher court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case