ANKITA ETC. vs ANSHU — 143/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 20th April 2026.

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBD080003742025

Case disposed

Filing Number

374/2025

Filing Date

28-03-2025

Registration No

143/2025

Registration Date

28-03-2025

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(3)

Petitioner(s)

ANKITA ETC.

Adv. Janakraj Meena

VEDANSH

Respondent(s)

ANSHU

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

20-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

13-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

25-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

17-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Order

Case Summary - 143/2025 The court granted the petition of Ankita (wife) and Vedansh (minor son) against Anshu (husband) under Section 144 of the Indian Civil Security Code, 2023. The petitioner alleged that after marriage, the respondent and his family subjected her to dowry demands and physical/mental cruelty; when she was three months pregnant, he threw her out of the house, and after she gave birth to their son, he refused to maintain them. The court found the respondent had sufficient means (earning ₹50,000 monthly from his business) and ordered him to pay ₹5,000 monthly for the wife's maintenance and ₹2,000 for the child's maintenance (total ₹7,000), effective from March 21, 2025, until the son attains 18 years of age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 143/2025 The court granted the petition of Ankita (wife) and Vedansh (minor son) against Anshu (husband) under Section 144 of the Indian Civil Security Code, 2023. The petitioner alleged that after marriage, the respondent and his family subjected her to dowry demands and physical/mental cruelty; when she was three months pregnant, he threw her out of the house, and after she gave birth to their son, he refused to maintain them. The court found the respondent had sufficient means (earning ₹50,000 monthly from his business) and ordered him to pay ₹5,000 monthly for the wife's maintenance and ₹2,000 for the child's maintenance (total ₹7,000), effective from March 21, 2025, until the son attains 18 years of age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case