State vs NARENDRA @ KAMMU ETC. Advocate - Khushi Mohd. Pathan — 110/2018
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,15. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD080002702018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
270/2018
Filing Date
15-02-2018
Registration No
110/2018
Registration Date
15-02-2018
Court
ACJM JM K Patan Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
385
Police Station
K.Patan
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER
Respondent(s)
NARENDRA @ KAMMU ETC. Advocate - Khushi Mohd. Pathan
RAMNARAYAN
Adv. K.M.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted both defendants (Narendra Urf Kummu and Ramaniarayan) of charges under Section 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, giving them the benefit of doubt. Although police evidence suggested 496 grams of suspected heroin were recovered from their motorcycle on September 21, 2017, the court found critical procedural violations—specifically the failure to follow mandatory procedures under Section 50 NDPS Act (obtaining an independent witness before personal search)—which fatally weakened the prosecution's case and rendered the seizure legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted both defendants (Narendra Urf Kummu and Ramaniarayan) of charges under Section 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, giving them the benefit of doubt. Although police evidence suggested 496 grams of suspected heroin were recovered from their motorcycle on September 21, 2017, the court found critical procedural violations—specifically the failure to follow mandatory procedures under Section 50 NDPS Act (obtaining an independent witness before personal search)—which fatally weakened the prosecution's case and rendered the seizure legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts