State vs DHANRAJ Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati — 24/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 15th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD080000472021
Filing Number
47/2021
Filing Date
11-01-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
11-01-2021
Court
ACJM JM K Patan Taluka
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
K.Patan
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER
Respondent(s)
DHANRAJ Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Dhanraj (Ramkishan Prajapati) Case No.: 24/2021 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, K. Patan, Bundelkhand District, Rajasthan Decision Date: May 15, 2026 Court's Decision The accused Dhanraj was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally mined and transported sand/minerals without proper authorization, as no independent witness corroborated the seizure, no expert verification confirmed the sand's origin, and critical procedural gaps existed in the investigation. Key Reasoning The court found insufficient evidence: the seized sand's source location was never properly verified, no mining department official testified regarding authorization, and the investigating officer failed to conduct proper site inspection. The defendant's confession alone—made in police custody—was insufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt under established evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Dhanraj (Ramkishan Prajapati) Case No.: 24/2021 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, K. Patan, Bundelkhand District, Rajasthan Decision Date: May 15, 2026 Court's Decision The accused Dhanraj was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally mined and transported sand/minerals without proper authorization, as no independent witness corroborated the seizure, no expert verification confirmed the sand's origin, and critical procedural gaps existed in the investigation. Key Reasoning The court found insufficient evidence: the seized sand's source location was never properly verified, no mining department official testified regarding authorization, and the investigating officer failed to conduct proper site inspection. The defendant's confession alone—made in police custody—was insufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt under established evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts