State vs DHANRAJ Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati — 24/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 15th May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080000472021

Case disposed

Filing Number

47/2021

Filing Date

11-01-2021

Registration No

24/2021

Registration Date

11-01-2021

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Act Section 4/21

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

DHANRAJ Advocate - Ramkishan Prajapati

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

15-05-2026

Disposed

04-05-2026

Final arguments

30-04-2026

Final arguments

28-04-2026

Final arguments

24-04-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Dhanraj (Ramkishan Prajapati) Case No.: 24/2021 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, K. Patan, Bundelkhand District, Rajasthan Decision Date: May 15, 2026 Court's Decision The accused Dhanraj was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally mined and transported sand/minerals without proper authorization, as no independent witness corroborated the seizure, no expert verification confirmed the sand's origin, and critical procedural gaps existed in the investigation. Key Reasoning The court found insufficient evidence: the seized sand's source location was never properly verified, no mining department official testified regarding authorization, and the investigating officer failed to conduct proper site inspection. The defendant's confession alone—made in police custody—was insufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt under established evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Dhanraj (Ramkishan Prajapati) Case No.: 24/2021 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, K. Patan, Bundelkhand District, Rajasthan Decision Date: May 15, 2026 Court's Decision The accused Dhanraj was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally mined and transported sand/minerals without proper authorization, as no independent witness corroborated the seizure, no expert verification confirmed the sand's origin, and critical procedural gaps existed in the investigation. Key Reasoning The court found insufficient evidence: the seized sand's source location was never properly verified, no mining department official testified regarding authorization, and the investigating officer failed to conduct proper site inspection. The defendant's confession alone—made in police custody—was insufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt under established evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case