State vs birju urf brijmohan meghwal Advocate - Dinesh Singh Hada — 8/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,34,. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 10th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBD080000212021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

21/2021

Filing Date

06-01-2021

Registration No

8/2021

Registration Date

06-01-2021

Court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

FIR Details

FIR Number

164

Police Station

K.Patan

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341,323,34,

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

birju urf brijmohan meghwal Advocate - Dinesh Singh Hada

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Final arguments

06-03-2026

Final arguments

24-02-2026

Appearance of accused

18-02-2026

Appearance of accused

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Judgement

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota (Rajasthan) convicted the accused Birju Urf Brajmohan on March 10, 2026, under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 34 (common intention) for assaulting two victims on May 11, 2019. The court found the prosecution's evidence—particularly eyewitness testimony from witness Bhavarla and medical records documenting the injuries—sufficient to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, sentencing him to probation under the Juvenile Justice Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kota (Rajasthan) convicted the accused Birju Urf Brajmohan on March 10, 2026, under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 34 (common intention) for assaulting two victims on May 11, 2019. The court found the prosecution's evidence—particularly eyewitness testimony from witness Bhavarla and medical records documenting the injuries—sufficient to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, sentencing him to probation under the Juvenile Justice Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM K Patan Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case