state vs unknown — 48/2026
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16/54. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJBD020007202026
Filing Number
719/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
CJM ACJM JM Bundi HQ
Judge
6-Acjm
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Excise Thana Bundi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.state
Adv. A.P.O.
Respondent(s)
-
1.unknown
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 48/2026 Summary The court found merit in the petitioner's (State's) plea under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Employees Conduct Rules regarding alleged misconduct by an accused officer. The FIR was registered and an F.I.R. report was filed; however, the court noted insufficient evidence of wrongdoing in the final report. The court dismissed the case while directing that no adverse action be taken against the accused absent concrete proof of misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
Case 48/2026 Summary The court found merit in the petitioner's (State's) plea under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Employees Conduct Rules regarding alleged misconduct by an accused officer. The FIR was registered and an F.I.R. report was filed; however, the court noted insufficient evidence of wrongdoing in the final report. The court dismissed the case while directing that no adverse action be taken against the accused absent concrete proof of misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts