Ramlaxman vs Gobri Bai — 71/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--Settled by ADR on 12th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJBD010023682018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
448/2018
Filing Date
30-08-2018
Registration No
71/2018
Registration Date
30-08-2018
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Settled by ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramlaxman
Adv. Ramdutt Sharma
Respondent(s)
Gobri Bai
Kastoor chand
Suwa Lal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 17-11-2025 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Judge of Bundi has allowed the civil appeal and set aside the trial court's judgment that had dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against defendants regarding disputed agricultural land (Khesra 277, 5 Bigha). The court found that the trial court failed to properly consider the jurisdiction issue raised by defendants and remanded the case with directions to the trial court to separately frame an issue on jurisdiction, allow both parties to present oral and documentary evidence, and pass a properly reasoned judgment in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Judge of Bundi has allowed the civil appeal and set aside the trial court's judgment that had dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against defendants regarding disputed agricultural land (Khesra 277, 5 Bigha). The court found that the trial court failed to properly consider the jurisdiction issue raised by defendants and remanded the case with directions to the trial court to separately frame an issue on jurisdiction, allow both parties to present oral and documentary evidence, and pass a properly reasoned judgment in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts