Dinesh Jain vs State Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 276/2018

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 372. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJBD010023202018

Filing Number

1862/2018

Filing Date

27-Aug-2018

Registration No

276/2018

Registration Date

27-Aug-2018

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Jain

    Adv. Gitesh Pancholi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 276/2018 Dinesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan The appellate court acquitted Dinesh Jain of food adulteration charges under the Food Adulteration Prevention Act, 1954 (Sections 7/16 and Rule 50). The trial court's conviction was overturned because the prosecution failed to properly follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 13(2) of the Act regarding food sample examination reports, and the evidence showed significant discrepancies between public and central laboratory test results that undermined sample integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  7. 24-Feb-2026
  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  10. 20-Feb-2026
  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  13. 11-Feb-2026
  14. 11-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  19. 03-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  20. 25-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  21. 09-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  22. 28-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  23. 04-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  24. 09-Jan-2025

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  25. 29-Oct-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  26. 24-Sep-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  27. 24-Jul-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  28. 28-May-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  29. 30-Mar-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  30. 31-Jan-2024

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  31. 17-Nov-2023

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  32. 26-Sep-2023

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  33. 08-Jun-2023

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  34. 09-Mar-2023

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  35. 13-Jan-2023

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  36. 27-Sep-2022

    Final arguments

    ADJ I

  37. 13-Jun-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ I

  38. 16-Feb-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ I

  39. 02-Dec-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ I

  40. 02-Aug-2021

    Awaiting records

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 08-Jun-2021

    Awaiting records

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 12-May-2021

    Awaiting records

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 09-Feb-2021

    Awaiting records

    District Judge

  44. 19-Nov-2020

    Awaiting records

    District Judge

  45. 07-Oct-2020

    Awaiting records

    District Judge

  46. 14-Jul-2020

    Awaiting records

    District Judge

  47. 23-Jun-2020

    Awaiting records

    District Judge

  48. 28-May-2020

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    District Judge

  49. 28-Apr-2020

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    District Judge

  50. 26-Jun-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    District Judge

  51. 27-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 27-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 276/2018 Dinesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan The appellate court acquitted Dinesh Jain of food adulteration charges under the Food Adulteration Prevention Act, 1954 (Sections 7/16 and Rule 50). The trial court's conviction was overturned because the prosecution failed to properly follow mandatory procedural requirements under Section 13(2) of the Act regarding food sample examination reports, and the evidence showed significant discrepancies between public and central laboratory test results that undermined sample integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case