Anish Bhai vs Mohd. Hanif — 44/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBD010022192022

Filing Number

349/2022

Filing Date

23-Aug-2022

Registration No

44/2022

Registration Date

23-Aug-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anish Bhai

    Adv. Leeladhar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohd. Hanif

  2. 2.Mohd. Bhai

  3. 3.Jakir

  4. 4.Aslam

  5. 5.Abid

  6. 6.Sabir

  7. 7.Up Panjiyak

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 15-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 13-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 03-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 21-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 20-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 17-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 12-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 13-May-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 06-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 07-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 25-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 07-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 02-Nov-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 16-Oct-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  27. 08-Sep-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  28. 14-Jul-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  29. 31-Mar-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  30. 27-Feb-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  31. 13-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  32. 09-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  33. 03-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  34. 07-Dec-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  35. 30-Nov-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  36. 23-Nov-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  37. 14-Nov-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  38. 07-Nov-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  39. 31-Oct-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  40. 15-Oct-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  41. 29-Sep-2022

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 44/2022 (Anish Bhai v. Mohd. Hanif & Others) The Additional District Judge rejected petitioner Anish Bhai's application under Order 7, Rule 11 (CPC) seeking to dismiss respondent Mohd. Hanif's suit for partition and declaration regarding allegedly inherited property. The court found that the disputed property—including shop no. 44, other commercial units, and residential property—was validly transferred to Mohd. Hanif (respondent 1) through a registered deed dated 04.02.2008 executed by their deceased father. Under Islamic law, the will was void as it exceeded the permissible 1/3 share limit. The court determined that all issues raised (property ownership, will validity, title) were mixed questions of fact and law requiring evidence, falling outside Order 7, Rule 11 scope. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 29-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  43. 28-Sep-2022

    Orders

    ADJ I

  44. 27-Sep-2022

    Orders

    ADJ I

  45. 20-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  46. 19-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  47. 14-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  48. 13-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ I

  49. 12-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder / Additional Written Statement

    ADJ I

  50. 23-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 23-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 44/2022 (Anish Bhai v. Mohd. Hanif & Others) The Additional District Judge rejected petitioner Anish Bhai's application under Order 7, Rule 11 (CPC) seeking to dismiss respondent Mohd. Hanif's suit for partition and declaration regarding allegedly inherited property. The court found that the disputed property—including shop no. 44, other commercial units, and residential property—was validly transferred to Mohd. Hanif (respondent 1) through a registered deed dated 04.02.2008 executed by their deceased father. Under Islamic law, the will was void as it exceeded the permissible 1/3 share limit. The court determined that all issues raised (property ownership, will validity, title) were mixed questions of fact and law requiring evidence, falling outside Order 7, Rule 11 scope. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case