State vs Satyanarayan Advocate - B.K. Rayaka — 142/2024
Case under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 75,79. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBD010020052024
Filing Number
1677/2024
Filing Date
29-07-2024
Registration No
142/2024
Registration Date
29-07-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Indergarh
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Satyanarayan Advocate - B.K. Rayaka
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State v. Satyanarayan (Case 142/2024) The court acquitted Satyanarayan of charges under Sections 75 and 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Protection and Rehabilitation of Children) Act, 2015, due to insufficient evidence. Though prosecution witnesses testified that two minors (Manish, 14-15 years, and Rahul, 10-11 years) worked at Satyanarayan's eatery for wages, the critical witnesses—the child laborers themselves and their parents—were never presented in court, rendering the prosecution's case weak and unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: State v. Satyanarayan (Case 142/2024) The court acquitted Satyanarayan of charges under Sections 75 and 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Protection and Rehabilitation of Children) Act, 2015, due to insufficient evidence. Though prosecution witnesses testified that two minors (Manish, 14-15 years, and Rahul, 10-11 years) worked at Satyanarayan's eatery for wages, the critical witnesses—the child laborers themselves and their parents—were never presented in court, rendering the prosecution's case weak and unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts