State vs Satyanarayan Advocate - B.K. Rayaka — 142/2024

Case under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 75,79. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJBD010020052024

Filing Number

1677/2024

Filing Date

29-Jul-2024

Registration No

142/2024

Registration Date

29-Jul-2024

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

Indergarh

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 75,79

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Satyanarayan Advocate - B.K. Rayaka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: State v. Satyanarayan (Case 142/2024) The court acquitted Satyanarayan of charges under Sections 75 and 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Protection and Rehabilitation of Children) Act, 2015, due to insufficient evidence. Though prosecution witnesses testified that two minors (Manish, 14-15 years, and Rahul, 10-11 years) worked at Satyanarayan's eatery for wages, the critical witnesses—the child laborers themselves and their parents—were never presented in court, rendering the prosecution's case weak and unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 19-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 17-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 15-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 14-Oct-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 29-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State v. Satyanarayan (Case 142/2024) The court acquitted Satyanarayan of charges under Sections 75 and 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Protection and Rehabilitation of Children) Act, 2015, due to insufficient evidence. Though prosecution witnesses testified that two minors (Manish, 14-15 years, and Rahul, 10-11 years) worked at Satyanarayan's eatery for wages, the critical witnesses—the child laborers themselves and their parents—were never presented in court, rendering the prosecution's case weak and unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case