Kalu Ram vs State Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 39/2019

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJBD010006672019

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

568/2019

Filing Date

15-02-2019

Registration No

39/2019

Registration Date

15-02-2019

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Allowed

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 374

Petitioner(s)

Kalu Ram

Adv. Surendra Narayaniwal

Respondent(s)

State Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADJ II

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Final arguments

23-01-2026

Final arguments

10-12-2025

Final arguments

19-11-2025

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Plaint/Petition/Appealmemo

Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi) partially allowed the appeal filed by Kailuram against his conviction under the Food Adulteration Prevention Act, 1954, Section 7/16 and Rule 50/16. While upholding the conviction, the court modified the sentence by replacing the original imprisonment of 6 and 3 months with a monetary fine of ₹2,000 (₹1,000 each for both offenses), considering that this was the appellant's first offense, he had been undertrial for 16 years, and he was 70 years old—factors making him eligible for benefits under the newer Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi) partially allowed the appeal filed by Kailuram against his conviction under the Food Adulteration Prevention Act, 1954, Section 7/16 and Rule 50/16. While upholding the conviction, the court modified the sentence by replacing the original imprisonment of 6 and 3 months with a monetary fine of ₹2,000 (₹1,000 each for both offenses), considering that this was the appellant's first offense, he had been undertrial for 16 years, and he was 70 years old—factors making him eligible for benefits under the newer Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case