harish gupta vs unknown Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 112/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section 136. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJBD010005252026
Filing Number
412/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
3-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
KeshoraiPatan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.harish gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.unknown Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 112/2028 The court rejected Harish Gupta's petition challenging a police FIR filed under Section 136 IPC at Kaipatn police station, Bundi district. The respondent's affidavit (dated 09.03.2026) established that no actionable offense exists in the present case and that the FIR warrant should not proceed. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the FIR as filed by police and dismissed the petition, directing the complainant to approach the District Judge if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Case Summary: 112/2028 The court rejected Harish Gupta's petition challenging a police FIR filed under Section 136 IPC at Kaipatn police station, Bundi district. The respondent's affidavit (dated 09.03.2026) established that no actionable offense exists in the present case and that the FIR warrant should not proceed. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the FIR as filed by police and dismissed the petition, directing the complainant to approach the District Judge if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts