Surendra urf Golu etc. vs State Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 115/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBD010005122026

Filing Number

402/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Lakheri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surendra urf Golu etc.

    Adv. Shifa Ul Haque

  2. 2.Suresh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 115/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Surendra alias Golu and Suresh was REJECTED by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are charged with serious offenses under IPC sections 281, 125, 303(2) and MMRD Act section 4/21, involving illegal sand mining and transporting mined material in a tractor-trolley in dangerous manner on highways. The court noted the accused's prior criminal history (multiple cases with convictions), the ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's substantial evidence connecting them to illegal quarrying operations. Considering the gravity of charges and risk factors, the court determined that bail was not warranted at this stage and that the trial court's earlier rejection should stand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 115/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Surendra alias Golu and Suresh was REJECTED by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are charged with serious offenses under IPC sections 281, 125, 303(2) and MMRD Act section 4/21, involving illegal sand mining and transporting mined material in a tractor-trolley in dangerous manner on highways. The court noted the accused's prior criminal history (multiple cases with convictions), the ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's substantial evidence connecting them to illegal quarrying operations. Considering the gravity of charges and risk factors, the court determined that bail was not warranted at this stage and that the trial court's earlier rejection should stand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case