Surendra urf Golu etc. vs State Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 115/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBD010005122026
Filing Number
402/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
3-ADJ I
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Lakheri
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Surendra urf Golu etc.
Adv. Shifa Ul Haque
Suresh
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ I
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 115/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Surendra alias Golu and Suresh was REJECTED by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are charged with serious offenses under IPC sections 281, 125, 303(2) and MMRD Act section 4/21, involving illegal sand mining and transporting mined material in a tractor-trolley in dangerous manner on highways. The court noted the accused's prior criminal history (multiple cases with convictions), the ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's substantial evidence connecting them to illegal quarrying operations. Considering the gravity of charges and risk factors, the court determined that bail was not warranted at this stage and that the trial court's earlier rejection should stand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 115/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Surendra alias Golu and Suresh was REJECTED by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are charged with serious offenses under IPC sections 281, 125, 303(2) and MMRD Act section 4/21, involving illegal sand mining and transporting mined material in a tractor-trolley in dangerous manner on highways. The court noted the accused's prior criminal history (multiple cases with convictions), the ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's substantial evidence connecting them to illegal quarrying operations. Considering the gravity of charges and risk factors, the court determined that bail was not warranted at this stage and that the trial court's earlier rejection should stand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts