pooja rathore vs mamta Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 106/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010004892026

Filing Number

382/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

566

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.pooja rathore

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.mamta Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 106/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against Pooja Rathore by Public Prosecutor Mamta Advocate, finding insufficient evidence of criminal conduct. The court held that the allegations under IPC Section 135 (2003) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita lack merit, and the F.I.R. filed by the Police Department was unjustified. Accordingly, the case was quashed and set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 106/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against Pooja Rathore by Public Prosecutor Mamta Advocate, finding insufficient evidence of criminal conduct. The court held that the allegations under IPC Section 135 (2003) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita lack merit, and the F.I.R. filed by the Police Department was unjustified. Accordingly, the case was quashed and set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case