harish kumar meghwal vs smt badam bai Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 101/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010004842026

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.harish kumar meghwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.smt badam bai Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 101/2026 The court rejected the FIR filed against Harish Kumar Meghwal under the Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient grounds for prosecution. The court held that the accused's consent as a designated officer to file the complaint was not properly obtained, and therefore the requisite legal procedure was not followed, rendering the FIR invalid and liable to be quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 101/2026 The court rejected the FIR filed against Harish Kumar Meghwal under the Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient grounds for prosecution. The court held that the accused's consent as a designated officer to file the complaint was not properly obtained, and therefore the requisite legal procedure was not followed, rendering the FIR invalid and liable to be quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case