Motilal vs State Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 113/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBD010004772026

Filing Number

370/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

113/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

428

Police Station

Hindoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Motilal

    Adv. Jitendra Kumar Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Bundi, rejected the bail application of Moti Lal under Section 483 BNS filed by the accused charged with serious offenses including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt with a weapon (Sections 115(2), 333, 109(2), 352, and 118(2) IPC). The court found that the chargesheet had been filed against the accused for allegedly severely assaulting a woman with a knife on multiple occasions while intoxicated, and that these grave and violent charges warranted continued custody rather than bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Bundi, rejected the bail application of Moti Lal under Section 483 BNS filed by the accused charged with serious offenses including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt with a weapon (Sections 115(2), 333, 109(2), 352, and 118(2) IPC). The court found that the chargesheet had been filed against the accused for allegedly severely assaulting a woman with a knife on multiple occasions while intoxicated, and that these grave and violent charges warranted continued custody rather than bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case