Kelash Chand Sharma vs Radheyshyam Advocate - Ajit Joshi — 13/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 01st May 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJBD010003842018
Filing Number
86/2018
Filing Date
15-Feb-2018
Registration No
13/2018
Registration Date
15-Feb-2018
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
3-ADJ I
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kelash Chand Sharma
Adv. Arvind P. Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Radheyshyam Advocate - Ajit Joshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 13/2018 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the civil appeal filed by Kelash Chand Sharma against respondent Radheyshyam, upholding the trial court's January 18, 2018 order rejecting Sharma's permanent injunction and declaratory plea. The court found that Sharma failed to prove the respondent caused damage to his property through unauthorized construction, concluding that respondent's building work remained within his own property boundaries with proper municipal approval, causing no demonstrable harm to Sharma's house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
30-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
20-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
13-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
30-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
28-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
28-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
16-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
- 27-Feb-2026
-
27-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
03-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
16-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
10-Oct-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
18-Aug-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
30-May-2025
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-May-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2023
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Apr-2023
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2022
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2022
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2022
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jan-2022
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Nov-2021
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2021
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2021
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2021
Final arguments
District Judge
-
20-Nov-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
29-Oct-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
04-Sep-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
10-Jul-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
14-May-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
09-Jan-2020
Final arguments
District Judge
-
06-Aug-2019
Final arguments
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2019
Final arguments
District Judge
-
03-Jul-2018
Final arguments
District Judge
-
23-Apr-2018
Final arguments
District Judge
-
24-Mar-2018
Final arguments
District Judge
-
07-Mar-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Feb-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2018
Case Summary: 13/2018 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge dismissed the civil appeal filed by Kelash Chand Sharma against respondent Radheyshyam, upholding the trial court's January 18, 2018 order rejecting Sharma's permanent injunction and declaratory plea. The court found that Sharma failed to prove the respondent caused damage to his property through unauthorized construction, concluding that respondent's building work remained within his own property boundaries with proper municipal approval, causing no demonstrable harm to Sharma's house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts