manjul govind vs tayaso vishwanath Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 65/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010002132026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

585

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.manjul govind

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.tayaso vishwanath Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the FIR against Manjul Govind, finding that the allegations of misconduct by the revenue officer lacked sufficient evidence and credibility. The court determined that the accused's actions did not constitute the alleged offense and upheld the principle that mere accusations without substantiation cannot sustain criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the FIR against Manjul Govind, finding that the allegations of misconduct by the revenue officer lacked sufficient evidence and credibility. The court determined that the accused's actions did not constitute the alleged offense and upheld the principle that mere accusations without substantiation cannot sustain criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case