lalit gupta vs mohanlal Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 62/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010002102026

Filing Number

158/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

688

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.lalit gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.mohanlal Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 62/2026 (Lalit Gupta v. Mohanlal Advocate) The court dismissed the petition as the accused's F.I.R. registration was found legally valid. The court held that an F.I.R. under U/S 135 E.Act 2003 was properly registered by Bundi police, and the procedural requirements were satisfied. The petitioner's challenge to the F.I.R. lacked merit, and the court upheld the investigation proceedings initiated by the Public Prosecutor's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 62/2026 (Lalit Gupta v. Mohanlal Advocate) The court dismissed the petition as the accused's F.I.R. registration was found legally valid. The court held that an F.I.R. under U/S 135 E.Act 2003 was properly registered by Bundi police, and the procedural requirements were satisfied. The petitioner's challenge to the F.I.R. lacked merit, and the court upheld the investigation proceedings initiated by the Public Prosecutor's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case