manish suman vs om meena Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 46/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010001932026

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

672

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.manish suman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.om meena Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the FIR against petitioner Manish Suman, finding that the police lacked proper authorization to file the case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that without valid sanction from competent authority and deficient notice to the accused, the FIR was procedurally invalid and could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the FIR against petitioner Manish Suman, finding that the police lacked proper authorization to file the case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that without valid sanction from competent authority and deficient notice to the accused, the FIR was procedurally invalid and could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case