manish suman vs rameshchand Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 45/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010001922026

Filing Number

140/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

700

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.manish suman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.rameshchand Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Manish Suman under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of illegal electricity theft. The court noted that the complainant (Rameshchand Advocate, Public Prosecutor) failed to provide proper notice to the accused and that the FIR lacked substantive grounds, warranting its quashing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Manish Suman under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, finding insufficient evidence of illegal electricity theft. The court noted that the complainant (Rameshchand Advocate, Public Prosecutor) failed to provide proper notice to the accused and that the FIR lacked substantive grounds, warranting its quashing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case