smt shagufta ansari vs pappulal Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 38/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJBD010001842026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
3-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
664
Police Station
Anti Power Theft
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.smt shagufta ansari
Respondent(s)
-
1.pappulal Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 38/2026 Summary The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Smt. Shagufta Ansari under Section 135 E.Act 2003, finding that the investigating officer's FIR was registered without proper notice to the accused and that the procedural requirements were not satisfied. The court held that the F.I.R. was improper and ordered its withdrawal, as the accused was not given adequate opportunity to present her case before registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2026
Case 38/2026 Summary The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Smt. Shagufta Ansari under Section 135 E.Act 2003, finding that the investigating officer's FIR was registered without proper notice to the accused and that the procedural requirements were not satisfied. The court held that the F.I.R. was improper and ordered its withdrawal, as the accused was not given adequate opportunity to present her case before registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts