sanjay meena vs pawan sharma Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 22/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 35. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010001672026

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

483

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.sanjay meena

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.pawan sharma Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of criminal misconduct. The court held that the allegations regarding improper conduct by a police officer were not substantiated and that the FIR could not proceed without proper investigation and evidence. Consequently, the petition for cancellation of the FIR was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of criminal misconduct. The court held that the allegations regarding improper conduct by a police officer were not substantiated and that the FIR could not proceed without proper investigation and evidence. Consequently, the petition for cancellation of the FIR was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case