sanjay meena vs satyanarayan Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 4/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJBD010001482026
Filing Number
96/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bundi HQ
Judge
3-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
641
Police Station
Anti Power Theft
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.sanjay meena
Respondent(s)
-
1.satyanarayan Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 4/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court held that the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting that the F.I.R. was recorded based on unsubstantiated claims by the complainant Sanjay Meena Kanishth Abhineta without adequate investigation by police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Summary of Case 4/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court held that the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting that the F.I.R. was recorded based on unsubstantiated claims by the complainant Sanjay Meena Kanishth Abhineta without adequate investigation by police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts