sanjay meena vs satyanarayan Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 4/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJBD010001482026

Case disposed

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ

Judge

3-ADJ I

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

FIR Details

FIR Number

641

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

sanjay meena

Respondent(s)

satyanarayan Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADJ I

14-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order

Summary of Case 4/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court held that the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting that the F.I.R. was recorded based on unsubstantiated claims by the complainant Sanjay Meena Kanishth Abhineta without adequate investigation by police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 4/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed against petitioner Sanjay Meena, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court held that the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting that the F.I.R. was recorded based on unsubstantiated claims by the complainant Sanjay Meena Kanishth Abhineta without adequate investigation by police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Bundi HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case