STATE vs BALWANTSINGH ETC — 1186/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 332(3),126(2),115(2),324(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBA020023652025

Filing Number

2353/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

1186/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

ACJM JM Balotra District HQ

Judge

2-Acjm I Balotra

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

JASOL POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 332(3),126(2),115(2),324(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALWANTSINGH ETC

  2. 2.NARPATSINGH

  3. 3.GANPATSINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted the three accused (Balwantsingh, Narpatsingh, and Ganpatsingh) of charges under IPC Sections 332(C), 126(2), 115(2), and 324(2)/3(5), finding insufficient evidence that they damaged the complainant's motorcycle and household items on August 16, 2024. The prosecution witnesses failed to support the allegations, with the complainant herself retracting her claims during examination. However, the accused were convicted under Section 324(6) IPC and sentenced to six months imprisonment with a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm I Balotra

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Acjm I Balotra

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm I Balotra

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm I Balotra

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1186/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the three accused (Balwantsingh, Narpatsingh, and Ganpatsingh) of charges under IPC Sections 332(C), 126(2), 115(2), and 324(2)/3(5), finding insufficient evidence that they damaged the complainant's motorcycle and household items on August 16, 2024. The prosecution witnesses failed to support the allegations, with the complainant herself retracting her claims during examination. However, the accused were convicted under Section 324(6) IPC and sentenced to six months imprisonment with a bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case