STATE vs CHHAGNARAM Advocate - VIRENDRA SINGH MAHECHA — 797/2025
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 19/54. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 16th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBA020015922025
Filing Number
1585/2025
Filing Date
21-08-2025
Registration No
797/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
ACJM JM Balotra District HQ
Judge
2-ACJM I Balotra
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
JASOL POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APO I
Respondent(s)
CHHAGNARAM Advocate - VIRENDRA SINGH MAHECHA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM I Balotra
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Framing of Charge/ Plea
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 02-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 15-12-2025 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Chhagnaram (Case 797/2025) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted Chhagnaram Lal Ram under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, for possessing 54 bottles of country liquor without authorization on October 24, 2024. However, the court granted him the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, Section 4(1), rather than imposing imprisonment. Key Reasoning: The prosecution proved through witness testimony and seized evidence that the accused possessed illicit liquor without any permit or license. The court found the evidence credible and conviction justified. Given the accused's circumstances, age, and first-time offense nature, the court deemed probation with conditions (₹10,000 bail bond, ₹700 court fee, and one-year supervision) more appropriate than custodial punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Chhagnaram (Case 797/2025) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted Chhagnaram Lal Ram under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, for possessing 54 bottles of country liquor without authorization on October 24, 2024. However, the court granted him the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, Section 4(1), rather than imposing imprisonment. Key Reasoning: The prosecution proved through witness testimony and seized evidence that the accused possessed illicit liquor without any permit or license. The court found the evidence credible and conviction justified. Given the accused's circumstances, age, and first-time offense nature, the court deemed probation with conditions (₹10,000 bail bond, ₹700 court fee, and one-year supervision) more appropriate than custodial punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts