STATE vs BHAGIRATH Advocate - NIRMAL KHARWAL — 84/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,307,323(34). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: RJBA010006382016
Filing Number
250/2016
Filing Date
22-10-2016
Registration No
84/2016
Registration Date
22-10-2016
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
4-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
278
Police Station
BALOTRA POLICE STATION
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
BHAGIRATH Advocate - NIRMAL KHARWAL
SHRI RAM
Adv. NIRMAL KHARWAL
SMT. BALU DEVI @ MAPHI DEVI
Adv. NIRMAL KHARWAL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Restored
Judgment
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Restored |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Bhagirath (84/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Balotara acquitted all three accused—Bhagirath, Shri Ram, and Balu Devi—of charges under IPC sections 452/34 (house trespass), 323/34 (causing hurt), and 307/34 (attempt to cause death) on March 23, 2026, due to lack of sufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The complainant and all prosecution witnesses, including the primary witness, turned hostile and contradicted the FIR allegations, denying that any assault or house trespass occurred. With no credible eyewitness testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative and no corroborating documentary evidence, the court found the charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Bhagirath (84/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Balotara acquitted all three accused—Bhagirath, Shri Ram, and Balu Devi—of charges under IPC sections 452/34 (house trespass), 323/34 (causing hurt), and 307/34 (attempt to cause death) on March 23, 2026, due to lack of sufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The complainant and all prosecution witnesses, including the primary witness, turned hostile and contradicted the FIR allegations, denying that any assault or house trespass occurred. With no credible eyewitness testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative and no corroborating documentary evidence, the court found the charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts