STATE vs BHAGIRATH Advocate - NIRMAL KHARWAL — 84/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,307,323(34). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: RJBA010006382016

Filing Number

250/2016

Filing Date

22-Oct-2016

Registration No

84/2016

Registration Date

22-Oct-2016

Court

DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ

Judge

4-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

278

Police Station

BALOTRA POLICE STATION

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 452,307,323(34)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGIRATH Advocate - NIRMAL KHARWAL

  2. 2.SHRI RAM

    Adv. NIRMAL KHARWAL

  3. 3.SMT. BALU DEVI @ MAPHI DEVI

    Adv. NIRMAL KHARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Bhagirath (84/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Balotara acquitted all three accused—Bhagirath, Shri Ram, and Balu Devi—of charges under IPC sections 452/34 (house trespass), 323/34 (causing hurt), and 307/34 (attempt to cause death) on March 23, 2026, due to lack of sufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The complainant and all prosecution witnesses, including the primary witness, turned hostile and contradicted the FIR allegations, denying that any assault or house trespass occurred. With no credible eyewitness testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative and no corroborating documentary evidence, the court found the charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  12. 25-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  15. 13-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  16. 20-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  17. 27-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  18. 25-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  19. 20-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  20. 05-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  21. 28-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  22. 24-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  23. 12-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  24. 30-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  25. 04-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  26. 09-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  27. 16-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  28. 14-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  29. 19-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  30. 08-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  31. 15-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  32. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  33. 03-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  34. 01-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ I

  35. 11-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  36. 11-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  37. 13-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  38. 26-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  39. 07-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  40. 30-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  41. 29-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  42. 18-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

  43. 07-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  44. 09-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  45. 13-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  46. 03-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  47. 08-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  48. 15-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  49. 01-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  50. 19-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  51. 17-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  52. 06-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  53. 11-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  54. 16-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  55. 30-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  56. 14-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  57. 03-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  58. 22-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  59. 28-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  60. 18-Sep-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  61. 05-Sep-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  62. 22-Jun-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  63. 08-May-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  64. 28-Mar-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  65. 16-Feb-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  66. 08-Jan-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    District and Sessions Judge

  67. 10-Nov-2017

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    District and Sessions Judge

  68. 09-Nov-2017

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    District and Sessions Judge

  69. 08-Nov-2017

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    District and Sessions Judge

  70. 06-Nov-2017

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    District and Sessions Judge

  71. 26-Sep-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  72. 17-Aug-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  73. 11-Jul-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  74. 03-Jun-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  75. 10-May-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  76. 04-Apr-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  77. 28-Feb-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  78. 09-Jan-2017

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  79. 03-Nov-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 22-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Bhagirath (84/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Balotara acquitted all three accused—Bhagirath, Shri Ram, and Balu Devi—of charges under IPC sections 452/34 (house trespass), 323/34 (causing hurt), and 307/34 (attempt to cause death) on March 23, 2026, due to lack of sufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The complainant and all prosecution witnesses, including the primary witness, turned hostile and contradicted the FIR allegations, denying that any assault or house trespass occurred. With no credible eyewitness testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative and no corroborating documentary evidence, the court found the charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case